Acoustic neuroma symptoms

In may 2011, an IARC expert committee classified RF radiation as a possible human carcinogen [group 2B]. Since then, the evidence has grown stronger.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms after the NTP and ramazzini animal studies both showed higher rates of cancer among rats exposed to cell phone radiation, a number of observers argued that IARC should upgrade RF to a “probable” cancer agent [group 2A] or simply “carcinogenic to humans” [group 1]. (more on the IARC classifications here.)

acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

Following the release of the ramazzini institute results last year, fiorella belpoggi, the principal investigator, called on IARC to take another look (see our story).Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms belpoggi is the director of the institute’s research center in bologna, italy and was a member of the IARC priorities panel.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms she would not comment on their deliberations because, she said, IARC required participants to sign a confidentiality agreement.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms the panel met during the last week of march in lyon, IARC’s hometown.

Paul demers, another member of the panel, said that he was “happy with the decision.” demers, the director of the occupational cancer research centre in toronto, noted that he is not sure what a new working group would decide but that there have been more studies since the last RF monograph and the “animal studies cerainly deserve evaluation.”

acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

“it is very good news,” tony miller, an emeritus professor of epidemiology at the university of toronto, wrote in an e-mail.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms he cited the substantial human epidemiology and animal evidence of carcinogenicity that has accrued since the 2011 evaluation.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms “if a working group were to conclude that RF is a group 1 human carcinogen, as many of us now believe,” he said, “it would be impossible for governments and public health authorities to ignore.”

acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

Titled “brain and salivary gland tumors and mobile phone use: evaluating the evidence from various epidemiological study designs,” the new paper is a detailed look at the literature and includes a meta-analysis of many of the studies that have been completed over the years.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms the lead author is martin röösli of the university of basel in switzerland.

At the close of the panel meeting, there was talk of a minority report by those who disagreed with the 2B designation.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms but it never happened. The annual review paper fills that gap, though it’s a bit late as many are now asking IARC to reclassify RF radiation as a probable human carcinogen (2A), or even as a known carcinogen (1) in light of the NTP and ramazzini animal studies.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

These disputes are shining a spotlight on the workings of ICNIRP at a time it is under growing scrutiny. A team of reporters is working together on a project called “investigate europe: the 5G mass experiment,” a series of articles published across the continent on the health implications of the 5G rollout.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms the german affiliate coined the phrase, “the ICNIRP cartel.”

When röösli submitted the manuscript last august, jerrett worried that the authors had overstated the no-risk case and asked joel moskowitz at UC berkeley to take a look and offer an informal peer review.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms “the paper is the most biased review of this topic that I have [ever] read,” moskowitz replied. He urged jerrett not to publish it, telling him that doing so would be a “disservice to public health.”

acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

Moskowitz, an epidemiologist who tracks RF and health developments on his web site, electromagnetic radiation safety, has long believed that there is sufficient evidence to adopt precautionary policies and to limit exposures.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms ten years ago, he was a coauthor of a meta-analysis that found “possible evidence” linking mobile phones to cancer.

Jerrett and UCLA colleague jonathan fielding, the editor of the annual review of public health, referred a recent query from microwave news about the peer review process to jennifer jongsma, the director of production and the associate editor-in-chief of all 50 annual reviews, which cover assorted scientific topics from analytical chemistry to virology.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms she told me that the two external reviewers “well represented” the views of what she called the “counter group.” she went on to describe what happened next:

acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

Moskowitz says that he was never sent the revised manuscript for a second review. Jongsma told me that neither of the outside reviewers was asked to take another look and that the decision to publish was made by the editorial committee on its own.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms asked whether members of the committee have had experience with the RF issue, jongsma answered yes, without offering any specifics.Acoustic neuroma eye symptoms

acoustic neuroma eye symptoms